ELD


 * Teacher || Total Number of Students || Beginning || Partially Proficient || Proficient ||
 * Gaines 9th Grade || 64 || 46 || 17 || 1 ||
 * Tizer 10th Grade || 17 || 14 || 3 || 0 ||


 * Intensive Intervention ||
 * Strategic Intervention ||
 * Close to Proficiency ||
 * Name || Score ||  || Name || Score ||   || Name || Score ||   ||
 * Oscar Martinez || 0 ||  || Desaray Vasquez || 3 ||   || Antonio Vargas || 5 ||   ||
 * Adina Guzman || 0 ||  || Liliana Rodriguez || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Carlos Aguilera || 0 ||  || Rolando Javier || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Leonardo || 0 ||  || Jesus Cervantez || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Fernanda G || 0 ||  || Fransisco Valadez || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Daisy Martinez Villa || 0 ||  || Stacy Caloro || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Jose Uvanda || 0 ||  || Lucy Lopez || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Jose Gramiel || 0 ||  || Manuela Diaz || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Valenle || 0 ||  || Angelica Ortega || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Irma Torres || 1 ||  || Jose Casilias || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Joselyn Esparza || 1 ||  || Maria Salineis || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Luis Gallegos || 1 ||  || Erika Tarango || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Luis Susano || 1 ||  || Bianney Rodriguez || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Yessica G || 1 ||  || Diana Moreno || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Jose Ramirez || 1 ||  || Cassandra Cortez || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Celia Moncada || 1 ||  || Ana Padilla || 4 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Alexis Lozaro || 1 ||  || Claria Soto || 4 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Maria Rosales || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Cristian Queza || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Joel Vazquez || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Yesenia Sanchez || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Alex Hermosillo || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Daniel Lechuga || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Jeremy Salnz || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Lisandro R || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Jorge Rodriguez || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Valerie Garcia || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Stephanie Cruz || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Angel Alvarez || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Roberto Rueda || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Estefany Rodriguez || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Mayra Gomez || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Edith Mojica || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Jovany C. || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Manuel V. || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Maria A. || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Maria T. || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Tiare Lopez || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Dhayu || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Mireya G. || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Yessica Vasquez || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * David Valencia || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Yzela Flores || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Isaac Garcia || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Lupita Ramirez || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||

 ELD Literacy SMART Goal  ** ELD Literacy 1 SMART Goal ** ** The percentage of ELD Literacy 1 students scoring proficient or higher in Summarizing will increase from 3% to 20% by the end of first quarter as measured by the Summary Assessment administered on or before October 8th. **   ** ESL English III SMART Goal ** ** The percentage of ESL English III students scoring proficient or higher in Summarizing will increase from 3% to 20% by the end of first quarter as measured by the Summary Assessment administered on or before October 8th. ** Step 5: Determine Results Indicators  If teacher explicitly teaches and models Main Idea Graphic Organizer, then students will utilize the graphic organizer to create a proficient main idea of a reading passage.
 * Intensive Intervention ||
 * Strategic Intervention ||
 * Close to Proficiency ||
 * Name || Score ||  || Name || Score ||   || Name || Score ||   ||
 * Flores-Gonzalez, Brenda E || 0 ||  || Alvarez-Reyes, Esteban D || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Loya-Gutierrez, Nayeli S || 0 ||  || Arreguin-Martinez, Micaela V || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Garcia, Jose R || 1 ||  || Montes, Brenda E || 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Ramirez-Estrada, Tere M || 1 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Barajas-Mares, Carla V || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Cruz, Rosa A || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Galvan-Marquez, Andrea || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Garcia-Mendoza, Karina || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Hernandez-Nunez, Luz A || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Maciel-Guzman, Juan A || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Marquez-Rodriguez, Luis A || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Mota, Juan Carlos G || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Rico, Carolina || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Sanchez, Edwin C || 2 ||  ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||

ELD Literacy 1 - In ELD Literacy 1, we increased from 3% to 55% proficiency in the skill of summarizing, based on the data below:


 * ** Teacher ** || ** Total ** || ** Early - 1 ** || ** Beginning - 2 ** || ** Partially Proficient 3 ** || ** Proficient 4 ** ||
 * Pre Assessment || 60 || 14 || 12 || 32 || 2 ||
 * Post Assessment (Only Pre- and Post- Results) || 53 || 3 || 4 || 16 || 29 ||

Some concerns: Number of students tested (difference). Reading ability - Essentially this is a reading skill, but we tested it through writing, so what does this mean? Go BACK to comprehension and teaching more reading strategies.

English III


 * ** Teacher ** || ** Total ** || ** Early - 1 ** || ** Beginning - 2 ** || ** Partially Proficient 3 ** || ** Proficient 4 ** ||
 * Pre Assessment || 18 || 6 || 6 || 5 || 1 ||
 * Post Assessment (Only Pre- and Post- Results) || 19 || 2 || 7 || 8 || 2 ||

English Language Development (not literacy):

Descriptive Writing that Compares and Contrasts · Adjectives · Comparatives · Possessive Adjectives Pre-Assessment: Week of 11/8

47% Partially Proficient 13% Below Proficient ||
 * Teacher Name || Gaines ||
 * Data for Which Assessment || Pre-Assessment ||
 * Assessment Administered Date || 11/05/2010 ||
 * # of Students Assessed || 15 ||
 * # of Students Proficient || 6 ||
 * # of Students Partially Proficient || 7 ||
 * # of Students Below Proficient || 2 ||
 * Proficiency Rate (Percentage): || 40% Proficient

The percentage of English Language Development students (ELA Level 1) scoring proficient or higher in the placement and form of adjectives, comparative adjectives, and possessive adjectives will increase from 40% to 80% by the end of the first semester as measured by the Adjective Assessment administered before December 8.

Teacher Modeling Listening to chants and descriptions Identifying adjectives Sentence Frames Dice Game Describing Pictures Vocabulary Building

25% Partially Proficient 0% Below Proficient ||
 * Teacher Name || Gaines ||
 * Data for Which Assessment || Post-Assessment ||
 * Assessment Administered Date || 12/08/2010 ||
 * # of Students Assessed || 16 ||
 * # of Students Proficient || 12 ||
 * # of Students Partially Proficient || 4 ||
 * # of Students Below Proficient || 0 ||
 * Proficiency Rate (Percentage): || 75% Proficient

I did not reach my SMART goal of 80%, but I did show great improvement. NONE of my students scored below proficient.Smart

Smart Goal for ELD Literacy 2 The percentage of ELD Literacy 2 students scoring proficient or higher in word choice and sentence fluency will increase from 51% to 60% by 2/25/11 as measured by writing a paragraph using unit vocabulary words on 2/23/11. Proficiency Rate (percentage): 50% P 20% PP 30% BP Read text using vocabulary words Write complete sentences using vocabulary words. Create simple definitions using vocabulary words. Using different genre, read text and highlight vocabulary words. Write a compare and contrast paragraph using vocabulary words.
 * Teacher Name || Villegas ||
 * Date for which Assessment || Pre- Assessment ||
 * Assessment administered Date || 1/24/11 ||
 * 1) of Student Assessed 34
 * 2) of Students Proficient 18
 * 3) of Students Partially Proficient 6
 * 4) of Students Below Proficient 10


 * Teacher Name || Villegas ||
 * Date for Assessment || Post -Assesment ||
 * Assessment administered Date || 2/14/11 ||
 * Student Assessed || 30 ||
 * Student Proficient || 16 ||
 * Student Partially Proficient || 7 ||
 * Student Below Proficient || 7 ||
 * P || 50% ||
 * PP || 25% ||
 * BP || 25% ||


 * ELD Literacy 1**

**SMART GOAL**: The percentage of ELD Literacy 1 students scoring proficient or higher on a SCR based on the CSAP SCR Writing Rubric (focus on Ideas and Organization) will increase from 36% to 70% by February 25 as measured by a Short Constructed Response administered on February 18.

36% Proficient 62% Partially Proficient 2% Below Proficient || 74% Proficient 12% Partially Proficient 2% Below Proficient ||
 * Teacher Name || Gaines ||
 * Data for Which Assessment || Pre-Assessment ||
 * Assessment Administered Date || 1/21/2011 ||
 * # of Students Assessed || 45 ||
 * # of Students Advanced || 0 ||
 * # of Students Proficient || 16 ||
 * # of Students Partially Proficient || 28 ||
 * # of Students Below Proficient || 1 ||
 * Proficiency Rate (Percentage): || 0% Advanced
 * ELD Literacy 1 Data Results ****﻿ **
 * Teacher Name || Gaines ||
 * Data for Which Assessment || Post-Assessment ||
 * Assessment Administered Date || 2/18/2011 ||
 * # of Students Assessed || 50 ||
 * # of Students Advanced || 6 ||
 * # of Students Proficient || 37 ||
 * # of Students Partially Proficient || 6 ||
 * # of Students Below Proficient || 1 ||
 * Proficiency Rate (Percentage): || 12% Advanced

 ﻿ I met my SMART GOAL and even moved a few kids into Advanced...Yay! Tizer **SMART GOAL:** The percentage of **ESL Eng. 1** students scoring proficient or higher on their use of conventions on SCRs will increase from 25% to 50% by March 1 as measured by the CSAP SCR rubric administered on February 25. Tizer- Pre-assessment- Teacher Data Compilation


 * Teacher Name: || Nadja Tizer ||
 * Data for Which Assessment: || Pre-assessment ||
 * Assessment Administered Data: || January 4, 2011 ||
 * Students Assessed || 12 ||
 * Students Proficient: || <span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style','serif'; font-size: 12pt; line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">3 ||
 * <span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style','serif'; font-size: 12pt; line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Proficiency Rate (Percentage): || <span style="font-family: 'Bookman Old Style','serif'; font-size: 12pt; line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">25 % ||

** Teaching Strategies: ** ** 1. ** Explicitly model and direct students in creating sentences with a subject, verb and compliment. ** 2. ** Look at model sentences daily and label the subject and verb. ** 3. ** Look at different types of sentence models that contain subject+ verb+ compliment and ask students to develop parallel sentences. ** 4. ** Look at model paragraph developed with eleven sentences containing a subject, verb and compliment and then ask students to create parallel paragraphs.